The hippo gets clean and free of ticks, while the red-billed oxpecker gets lunch and protection from the big hulking hippo.
They call this symbiosis, and I see it every day working in a newsroom between journalists working towards a deadline and PR people who
have to spread the word.
Which one is the hippo and which one is the little bird
really depends on whose side you're on. The fact remains however that media releases sent out en
masse by public relations professionals are increasingly becoming an integral
part of the everyday news bulletin.
Richard Aedy stated in a 2012 media report that the heavy reliance on media releases was
journalism's dirty little secret, and that "once you take out crime,
disasters, sport and firemen rescuing kittens from stormwater drains, most of
what’s left begins life as a media release."
There are more than a few reasons why this is the case.
Firstly, it's easy. As a journalist trying to meet daily or
even hourly deadlines, taking news that land in your lap can only be too easy.
Let's keep in mind that PR practitioners and journalists are
being trained in the same Universities, often doing the same courses and
learning the same techniques.
When a journalist sees a press release written in a concise
manner selling a point, the temptation to simply add a byline and publish to
meet a deadline is immense. And this is speaking from personal experience.
Secondly, if you ever want to speak to someone in a position
of power, be it a politician or a prop for the Newcastle Knights, there will be
a caveat. As Aedy states, to get to the source, a journalist will "have to
deal with someone whose job it is to craft how their boss appears in the media."
But perhaps the most telling reason as to why media releases
have engrained themselves into news bulletins is the simple fact that there are
just more PR professionals out there for journalists to fact check.
What does this mean for investigative journalism?
Clearly, newsrooms are shrinking and platoons of PR people are
growing. The 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill provided a clear picture of the times, with more PR people present at the press conference to give answers than there were journalists to ask questions.
Less personnel in the newsroom means less time to investigate stories
thoroughly in the non-stop race to get a bulletin or a story up in time.
This does not make investigative journalism obselete or any
less important.
Indeed, it makes it all the more critical for journalists to
be on their guard and navigate the minefield of press releases unloaded on them
each day with poise.
Media releases are the seed capital for a story, something
to build on and explore.
Unfortunately, journalists have just started serving
up seeds - repackaged press releases with no insight into the issue.
Investigative journalism isn't dead by any stretch of the imagination, but if journalists want to keep the vital tradition alive in their own newsroom, perhaps its time to pick up the phone and make some calls the next time they open a press release.
What an interesting post Judd,
ReplyDeleteI have to disagree. As a PR and Journalism student working as a Marketing Assistant I have come to understand the importance of having positive relationships with journalists and vice versa.
In PR we do not shed this negative light on Journalists and appreciate both professions. I acknowledge your opinion however I believe to be a successful journalist you will need to value PR practitioners.